Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

(Download) "Henry W. Goff v. State Idaho" by Supreme Court of Idaho No. 9725 # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Henry W. Goff v. State Idaho

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Henry W. Goff v. State Idaho
  • Author : Supreme Court of Idaho No. 9725
  • Release Date : January 20, 1966
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 54 KB

Description

Plaintiff (appellant), an inmate of the state penitentiary, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, prepared by himself without the aid of counsel. In his petition he alleges that he was detained in the county jail in Shoshone county from seven to eight months before being committed to the state penitentiary for a term of not more than twenty years upon a conviction of robbery. He specifically alleges that his rights were violated during the course of his imprisonment in the county jail in two particulars: first, that he was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment, and second, that he was incarcerated with prisoners who had been convicted and sentenced, without being separated from such other prisoners, as required by I.C. § 20-603. The cruelty alleged, consisted of being tormented by other prisoners and by the jailer and deputy sheriff. The trial court correctly held that these complaints concerned past events, and raised issues now moot. The conditions or legality of plaintiff's detention in the county jail, did not deprive the district court of jurisdiction to enter judgment upon conviction, nor affect the validity of that judgment. Hence such complaints cannot now be urged as a ground for discharge in this proceeding. Franklin v. State, 87 Idaho 291, 392 P.2d 552 (1964); Cobas v. Clapp, 79 Idaho 419, 319 P.2d 475 (1957); Victoria v. Young, 80 Nev. 279, 392 P.2d 509, 511 (1964); Wears v. Hudspeth, 167 Kan. 191, 205 P.2d 1188, 1189 (1949). It does not appear from the petition whether plaintiff entered a plea of guilty, or whether he was convicted by a jury. He indicates in his petition that he had an attorney who was appointed by the district Judge, and that he had been given a preliminary hearing. However, the petition contains allegations which tend to raise an issue as to whether the plaintiff entered a plea of guilty by reason of coercion arising out of the treatment complained of while he was in the county jail. He alleges that he was near a nervous breakdown because of the treatment by other prisoners, the jailer and the deputy sheriff; that the deputy sheriff used vile epithets and names in addressing him; told him that he should plead guilty and ""get it over with"" and ""save the county extra expense""; and that was his only chance to get off easy, and the only way he would get out of the county jail.


Ebook Download "Henry W. Goff v. State Idaho" PDF ePub Kindle